I started with Massie's Antony, reviewed here at the end of February, and now I'm onto Caesar. Historically I'm obviously out of sequence, in terms of Massie's bibliography I'm not so sure. It matters not: Shakespeare rendered them as standalone stories, so we can't quibble when Massie follows suit.
As with Antony, the story is in the hands of a peripheral character, though not as peripheral as the secretary-slave Antony. Our narrator here is Decimus Brutus ("Mouse"), general, admiral, adviser and assassin, not to be confused with his cousin and fellow assassin Marcus Brutus ("Markie"). Mouse is being held captive by the Gauls, some time after the assassination, and is writing his memoir. He recalls meeting Caesar as a young lad - Caesar was leaving Mouse's mother's bedchamber, having done what Caesar was always doing with other men's wives. Mouse goes on to cross the Rubicon with Caesar and accompanies him to Egypt where Mouse also has a fling with Queen Cleopatra.
But back in Rome, as Caesar is planning to invade Parthia, Mouse begins to doubt the hero's judgment. Caesar is dictator for life but plans on passing power to his nephew Octavian, with Mouse as his guardian. Surely this is a form of kingship, which in turn means an end to the Republic and a loss of freedom for Roman citizens?
Mouse gets sucked into a conspiracy led by his father-in-law Cassius. Mouse is tasked with bringing in his cousin Markie, which he ultimately does. No one, however, can get Antony or Lepidus to pick a side. Cicero, the veteran windbag, is excluded from the plot; whatever the outcome, he will orate in favour of the winners.
The trick with retelling a tale where we all know what happened is to find a way of maintaining the suspense. Massie succeeds - I won't say how, obviously, only that it worked for me. I like Massie's Roman novels a great deal and will certainly track down the others. I may well even seek out his work in other periods.
