Total Pageviews
Showing posts with label Arthur Schnitzler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arthur Schnitzler. Show all posts
Thursday, 7 January 2016
Casanova's Homecoming - Arthur Schnitzler
Set, naturally enough, in Italy in the 18th century, this novella is a variant on Schnitzler's usual microscopic analysis of fin de siecle Viennese society. The theme, however, is his usual - the self-indulgence of sex.
The aged roue is marooned in Mantua, desperate to be allowed to return to his home city after 25 years. He meets, by chance, Olivo, a local landowner who, fifteen years earlier, Casanova loaned money to in order to marry. Being Casanova, his motives were not disinterested. He had already slept with the bride's mother and now slept with Olivo's intended, Amalia, before agreeing to the loan. Olivo, however, knows nothing of this. He is delighted to see Casanova, invites him to his country house and insists of repaying the loan. Amalia is equally pleased to see Casanova. He even convinces himself that she is eager to revisit their earlier tryst. But his true target is Olivo's neice and ward Marcolina, a mathematics prodigy a third of Casanova's age. He determines to have her at any price. After all, he reasons, she is not a virgin. He has seen the dashing Lieutenant Lorenzi leaving via her window at dawn.
Schnitzler doesn't moralise. He wants us to form our own judgements. It seems to me that while Casanova considers himself the great lover he always in fact contrives to pay for sex like some hideous eighteenth century kerb-crawler. He is a predator, devoid of conscience. He is vile, and he returns to Venice to become a paid informer for the Senate, a vile profession. I was startled, initially, that there is no comeback for his theft of Marcolina's favours. I had assumed that the tables would be turned and he would himself have been decieved by Amalia or one of the other women he now disdains. But there wasn't, and that's the point. The likes of Casanova always get away with their crimes. The only price he has to pay is that he has to live with himself. Only in his dreams does his essential humanity surface in horror and disgust, which it does in the sex-sated dream he has immediately after having his way with Marcolina. You know Schnitzler has a point to make when his paragraph stretches over pages.
Friday, 18 December 2015
Beatrice and Her Son - Arthur Schnitzler
Schnitzler was the Viennese novelist of the Freudian era. Beatrice and Her Son is one of his mature works, published just a year before World War One. It is is very short (three chapters and less than 100 pages) but very dense and ultimately quite shocking. Beatrice is the widow of a celebrated actor. She is probably not yet forty (Schnitzler is far too subtle to specify) and reasonably well off. Some respectable but slightly dull men of around her own age are showing an interest, now that her mourning period can be considered to be decently done. But on her summer holiday in the mountains with her son Hugo it is one of Hugo's schoolfriends that she takes to her bed. Schnitzler is a psychological novelist and sets up many reasons for her scandalous behaviour, Is it boredom, novelty, risk - or simply revenge? Revenge because the young man Fritz has hinted that Beatrice's late husband (of whom he does a good impression) had affairs - and/or revenge because Hugo is sleeping with an older woman, a former actress who may or may not have been one of his father's mistresses. Beatrice only regrets her amour when she overhears the boys talking? Are they talking - sniggering - about her? That same night Hugo comes home dejected. Beatrice guesses that his lover has dispensed with his services. How can she recover what she and Hugo had before the summer? The innocent intimacy of mother and son...
This is depth that Schnitzler is able to cram into his novella. He switches between profound internal monologue and meaningless social chit-chat. He probes Beatrice's character and motivations so deeply that a single paragraph lasts ten pages. Yet he never bores, probably because he keeps the novella so short, and he never lectures us with his ideas. Crucially, he does not judge his character. He merely gives us the symptoms and leaves us to make our own diagnosis.
This book is superb - the novella, which I love, at its best. I shall definitely be reading more Schnitzler.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

