Count Luna is an absolute work of genius by an extremely fine writer who is inexplicably under-translated into English. Sadly, I have now read all three of the more-or-less available: this, plus Baron Blagge and I was Jack Mortimer. My posts on the other two have had great responses and loads of clicks, so I don't see some enterprising publisher starts digging into Lernet-Holenia's back catalogue.
Like the others, Luna is a work of wit and imagination. It also hinges on a serious subject: how does a vanquished people deal with its guilt over the crimes against humanity committed in their name?
Alexander Jessiersky, a third generation millionaire of Polish extraction, lives in a palace in central Vienna. He has a beautiful wife and loads of children. He is not especially interested in the family transport business but it functions prosperously without him. Before the war, however, the board of directors wanted to buy a property owned by the down-at-heel aristocrat Count Luna. Luna wouldn't sell - it was the last of his inheritance - and the board of directors therefore reported him to the Gestapo who hauled him off to a concentration camp. Jessiersky had nothing to do with it - but he knows he should have intervened and used his veto. Guilt has gnawed at him throughout the war and after. During it, he tried to send Luna money and food. Now he is obsessed with the notion that Luna has survived his ordeal and is back in search of revenge.
Jessiersky is an obsessive researcher, happiest in his well-stocked private library. He delves, develops theories - and goes quietly mad. He takes to killing people. He flees Austria and ends up in the catacombs of Rome. We know this from the outset - his disappearance below ground in the Church of Sant' Urbino is where Lernet-Holenia starts his fable. The interest - the game - is how he came to be there. The genius is that Lernet-Holenia doesn't leave it there. He takes us with Jessiersky into what happens next, which is something rather beautiful.
Lernet-Holenia writes like a dream. He juggles complex ideas like guilt and death and the possible hereafter with deceptive ease. Jessiersky has done no more than thousands of his compatriots did. His only sin is that he failed to do something. The outcome of his inaction may not have been too terrible. But what Jessiersky does to himself and others fifteen years later is terrible. Terrible yet empathetic and therefore sad. We laugh and we sigh but always with sympathy. Which is what makes Count Luna an absolute masterpiece.